Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JOHNSON et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2019cv04264
Plaintiff:
RENEE CAMPBELL, KELLY SELLERS, KEREEN FORBES and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Faulk v. Frommer
as 3:2017cv00941
Plaintiff:
Arron Faulk
Defendant:
Frommer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LY v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT et al
as 2:2014cv00976
Plaintiff:
SANG NAM LY
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT, DOUGLAS G. ARRON, PHILIP MURRAY BRICKNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv04442
Plaintiff:
ARRON HOUSTON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES RAMSEY, MARY CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00851
Plaintiff:
Buster Hines
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard, James A. Schildt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villarrubia v. Tennis et al
as 4:2009cv01512
Plaintiff:
Jairo Villarrubia
Defendant:
Franklin J. Tennis, John Simons, P.A. Arrons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77443
Plaintiff:
ARRON POWELL, ARRON POWELL and BETTY POWELL
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JORDAN v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv73275
Plaintiff:
OLEN LAVOYN JORDAN, CLARENCE JACKSON ALLDREDGE, EUNICE HYDE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, BOC GROUP, INC. and others
Petitioner:
LANDY DELMAR ALDRIDGE and ROOSEVELT ALTOMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RIVERA v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2009cv01364
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO CORTES RIVERA
Defendant:
FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, EATON, DALE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
