Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cheryl Roby v. Sallie Mae, Inc., et al
as 13-56026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL F. ROBY, DBA Church for King Immanuel
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLIE MAE, INC., as agent for SLM Education Credit Finance Corporation and SLM Credit Finance Corporation, ACADEMIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES CORP., ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.L.C. and others
U.S. Bank National Association v. Worrell et al
as 1:2013cv01629
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Marilyn Dawn Worrell, Arrow Financial Services L.L.C. and Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv20255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
