Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2217
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
United States of America v. Smith
as 20-4190
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany, Jerry Slaughter, AKA Hood and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
POWELL et al v. ROEHL TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 1:2019at00620
Plaintiff:
ROSE POWELL and LAWRENCE HARRIS
Defendant:
ROEHL TRANSPORT, INC. and ARTHUR BULLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell et al v. Bullock et al
as 2:2019cv01727
Plaintiff:
Rose Powell and Lawrence Harris
Defendant:
Arthur Bullock and Roehl Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sealed Defendant # 5 v. USA
as 5:2011cv01495
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Arthur Bullock, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Smith (Slaughter)
as 11-1867
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny, Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jerry Slaughter, AKA Hood
United States of America v. Smith
as 11-880
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Reddell Smith, Clinton Hill, Jermaine Barnum and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Keith Horton, AKA Kizza
United States of America v. Scott
as 10-5039
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Reddell Smith, AKA Renny, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Marquise Scott, AKA Sem
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
