Cases 1 - 10 of 14
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2023cv01450
Petitioner:
ARTHUR LEE DAVIS, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Spaulding
as 3:2015cv01992
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Williams
Respondent:
S. Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOLMES et al v. SKILETZ et al
as 5:2015cv03906
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HOLMES , JR. and DAVID SANTEE
Defendant:
WILLIAM FRANK SKILETZ, IV , JOSHUA DAVID BRUBAKER , KEVIN BIROSIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest v. Glunt et al
as 3:2014cv01119
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Earnest
Respondent:
Steven Glunt and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv01919
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Woods
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Staff Employees at the Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROBINSON v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2010cv60221
Defendant:
ARTHUR LEE ROBINSON, ARTHUR LEE ROBINSON, ARTHUR LEE ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
CALLYE M. ROBINSON, CALLYE M. ROBINSON and CALLYE M. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KENDRIX v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86916
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE KENDRIX
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROBINSON v. CRANE COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv84269
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE ROBINSON
Defendant:
CRANE COMPANY, FMC CORP., ITT INDUSTRIAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WHITE et al v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv77202
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE WHITE and ARTHUR LEE WHITE
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
