Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Skipper v. Dormire et al
as 2:2007cv04201
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Arthur Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Dormire et al
as 4:2007cv00715
Petitioner:
Timothy Jacobs
Respondent:
David Dormire, Arthur Wood, Charles Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Crawford et al
as 2:2007cv04194
Plaintiff:
Derek James
Defendant:
Larry Crawford, David Rost, Terry Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Doremire et al
as 2:2007cv04179
Plaintiff:
Mickey Conley
Defendant:
David Doremire, F. Connell, Marian Ortbals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Cassady et al
as 2:2007cv04170
Plaintiff:
Mickey Conley
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, David Murphy, Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Fowler v. Larry Crawford, et al
as 07-2946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clifford Charles Fowler
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Crawford, Steve Long, Dave Dormire and others
James v. Crawford et al
as 2:2007cv04144
Plaintiff:
Derek James
Defendant:
Larry Crawford, Dave Dormire, Arthur Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Dormire et al
as 2:2007cv04141
Plaintiff:
Derek Q James
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Larry Crawford, Arthur Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wishon v. Dormire et al
as 2:2007cv04137
Plaintiff:
Robert S Wishon
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Arthur Wood, Lorraine Bright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Dormire et al
as 2:2007cv04110
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hinton
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Larry Crawford, Bill Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
