Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ASBURY IN CHEV, LLC d/b/a HARE CHEVROLET v. A TO B TRANSPORTATION INC. d/b/a A TO B TRANSPORTATION LLC
as 1:2022cv02051
Plaintiff:
ASBURY IN CHEV, LLC, d/b/a HARE CHEVROLET
Defendant:
A TO B TRANSPORTATION INC. d/b/a A TO B TRANSPORTATION LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act
SELF v. ASBURY INDY CHEV, LLC
as 1:2020cv03190
Plaintiff:
JANET S. SELF
Defendant:
ASBURY INDY CHEV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASBURY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00412
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. ASBURY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
ASBURY v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02577
Plaintiff:
CHASIDY N. ASBURY
Defendant:
COMM'R SOCIAL S ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Asbury v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Paul Asbury
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Asbury et al v. Hajarian et al
as 2:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joseph Asbury and Cheryl Asbury
Defendant:
Karen Hajarian and Melissa Ginter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
