Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Keith Young, Sr. v. USA, et al
as 17-20007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH STANLEY YOUNG, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, BISHOP HENRY WHIPPYE and others
Assoc Bldr and Contr of SE TX, et al v. Anne Rung, et al
as 16-41707
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS, ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITY COMPANIES
Defendant - Appellant:
ANNE RUNG, Administrator, Office of Federal Procurement Policy, Office of Management and Budget, ASHTON B. CARTER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DENISE T. ROTH, Administrator, United States General Services Administration and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Associated Builders and Contractors of Southest Texas et al v. Rung et al
as 1:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
Associated Builders and Contractors of Southest Texas , Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. and National Association of Security Companies
Defendant:
Anne Rung , Ashton B. Carter , Denise T. Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
State Of Texas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2016cv02726
Plaintiff:
State Of Texas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department Of Defense, Ashton B. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Dale Adams v. US Department of Defense, et al
as 16-41111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ASHTON B. CARTER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Any Unknown Named Essential Parties and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
