Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cannon v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2023cv12277
Plaintiff:
PAUL V. CANNON, JR and Paul V. Cannon, Jr.
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF THE CWABS INC, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-9, Korde & Associates, P.C., The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Estate of Bonell Rashti v. Bank of America National Assn, et al
as 18-20539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF BONELL RASHTI
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C. and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, As Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Incorporated Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-9, formerly known as Bank of New York
Ordway v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 2:2013cv13236
Plaintiff:
Crystal Ordway
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon , Bank of America, N.A. and Unknown Holders, the currently unknown Certificateholders of the CWABS Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-9
Rudolph et al v. America's Wholesale Lender et al
as 2:2011cv03750
Plaintiff:
Steven Rudolph and Wendy Rudolph
Defendant:
America's Wholesale Lender, Bank of America National Association , BAC Home Loan Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commonwealth Property Advocates et al v. Bank of New York Mellon, The et al
as 2:2011cv00575
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Property Advocates and Daniel Labrum
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, The , Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-9 , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Commonwealth Property Advocates v. Bank of New York Mellon, The et al
as 2:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Property Advocates
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, The, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-9, Recontrust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
