Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Association of Irritated Residents v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv05650
Plaintiff: Association of Irritated Residents, Association of Irritated Residents, Association of Irritated Residents and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, Wayne Nastri
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Committee For A Better Arvin, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 12-71332
Petitioner: COMMITTEE FOR A BETTER ARVIN, a California nonprofit corporation, COMITE RESIDENTES ORGANIZADOS AL SERVICIO DEL AMBIENTE SANO, an unincorporated association, ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS, an unincorporated association
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, LISA JACKSON, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, JARED BLUMENFELD, Regional Administrator, Region IX, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
AIR v. USEPA, et al
as 13-73398
Petitioner: ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS (AIR), a California non-profit corporation
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, inher official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, JARED BLUMENFELD, in his official capacity as Regional Administrator for region IX of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
El Comite Para El Bienestar De, et al v. EPA, et al
as 12-74184
Petitioner: EL COMITE PARA EL BIENESTAR DE EARLIMART, an unincorporated association, ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS, a California non-profit corporation, WISHTOYO FOUNDATION, a California non-profit corporation and others
Respondent: LISA JACKSON, in her official capacity as Administrator of the US EPA, JARED BLUMENFELD, in his official capacity as Regional Administrator for Region IX of the US EPA, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
City of LA, et al v. County of Kern, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-56564
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, RESPONSIBLE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Intervenor: ARVIN-EDISON WATER STORAGE DISTRICT, KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY, ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS and others
Defendant - Appellant: COUNTY OF KERN, KERN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Amicus Curiae: WATER ENVIROMENT FEDERATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLEAN WATER AGENCIES (NACWA), NATIONAL SOLID WASTES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION ("NSWMA")
Association of Irritated Residents et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00720
Plaintiff: Association of Irritated Residents , Center For Biological Diversity , Climate Change Law Foundation and others
Defendant: Environmental Protection Agency , Catherine McCabe , Alexis Strauss
Cause Of Action: (b) Clean Air Act
R & G Fanucchi, Inc., et al v. County of Kern, et al
as 08-56622
Plaintiff - Appellant: R & G FANUCCHI, INC., SIERRA TRANSPORT INC., RESPONSIBLE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT, INC.
Intervenor: ARVIN-EDISON WATER STORAGE DISTRICT, KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY, ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS and others
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTY OF KERN, KERN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
El Comite Para El, et al v. Helliker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-16000
Plaintiff - Appellee: EL COMITE PARA EL BIENESTAR DE EARLIMART, an unincorporated association, COMMUNITY & CHILDREN'S ADVOCATES AGAINST PESTICIDE POISONING, a Califonria non-profit corporation, WISHTOYO FOUNDATION, a California non-profit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: PAUL HELLIKER, in his official capacity as Director, Departent of Pesticide Regulation, TERRY TAMMINEN, in his official capacity as Secretary, CA Environmental Protection Agency, CATHERINE WITHERSPOON, in her official capacity s Executive Officer, Air Resources Board and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?