Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. Cangress, et al
as 21-55408
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Intervenor:
CANGRESS, DBA Los Angeles Community Action Network (LA CAN)
Amicus Curiae:
HOPE STREET COALITION, INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES and others
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55404
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES, WOMEN IN SKID ROW and others
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES, WOMEN IN SKID ROW and others
Anne Block v. WSBA, et al
as 21-35261
Defendant / Appellee:
BONNIE SCRUGGS JONES, AKA Dierkson, SARA DIVITTORIO, individually, and in her official capacity as an employee of defendant Snohomish County, JOHN PENNINGTON, individually, and in his marital community with defendant Crystal Hill Pennington, his wife and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNE BLOCK, Esquire
City of Huntington Beach v. FCC, et al
as 19-70146
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Amicus Curiae:
MISSOURI BASIN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, BERKSHIRE-LITCHFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, IOWA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOCIATION, MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, AND ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL POWER ASSOCIATION and others
Anne Block v. Washington State Bar Associati, et al
as 18-35690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNE BLOCK, Esquire, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, LINDA EIDE, individually and in her capacity as an employee of defendant Washington State Bar Association, ALLISON SATO, individually and in her capacity as defendant Washington State Bar Association and others
Block v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 2:2018cv00907
Plaintiff:
Anne K Block
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association , Kevin Bank, Linda Eide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Block v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 3:2018cv00981
Plaintiff:
Anne Block
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association, Kevin Bank, Linda Eide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Public Integrity Alliance, Inc, et al v. City of Tucson, et al
as 15-16142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, INC., an Arizona nonprofit membership corporation, BRUCE ASH, an individual, FERNANDO GONZALES, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, a chartered city of the State of Arizona, JONATHAN ROTHSCHILD, in his capacity as the Mayor of the City of Tucson, REGINA ROMERO, in her capacity as a member of the Tucson City Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON SECRETARY OF STATE, WASHINGTON STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES and others
Everest National Insurance Company v. Association of Washington Cities et al
as 3:2014cv06014
Plaintiff:
Everest National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Association of Washington Cities and Town of Eatonville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
