Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,472
T. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03377
Plaintiff: T. T.
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier LLC and Rasier-CA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01202
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PC) Drake v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff: Earl David Drake
Defendant: T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff: Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant: Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 1:2024cv00644
Petitioner: Paul C. Bolin
Respondent: Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenbarg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04627
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04629
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 2:2024cv01534
Petitioner: Paul C. Bolin
Respondent: Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seyedi Partners et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv04382
Plaintiff: FARANAK SOFALIAN
Petitioner: SEYEDI PARTNERS
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00667
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?