Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Phelps v. EAH Housing et al
as 3:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
EAH Housing, Yolanda Latrail, Odysey Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Phelps v. DOE et al
as 4:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
Yolanda DOE, CEO of E.A.H. Housing, Angela DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cantor v. Sienna on the Coast Condominium Owners Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Todd Cantor
Defendant:
Sienna on the Coast Condominium Owners Association, Inc., Frank Gordon, Beth Mouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tull v. New York City Housing Authorit
as 16-3609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rosalinda Tull
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Housing Authority
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority-Penn-Wortman Houses Management Office, Edith Atkins-John, Manager, Francia Astudillo, Housing Assistant and others
Tull v. NYCHA-Penn-Wortman Houses Management Office et al
as 1:2016cv01010
Defendant:
Francia Astudillo, Edith Atkins-John, Denise Brockington and others
Plaintiff:
Rosalinda Tull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Esmailzadegan et al v. The Links at Emerald Dunes Condominium Association et al
as 9:2015cv81276
Defendant:
The Links at Emerald Dunes Condominium Association, Inc. , JNE Services Incorporated and Karen M Nissen
Plaintiff:
Arash Esmailzadegan , Shahab Esmailzadegan , Shiva Esmailzadegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Huffman v. Counselor Flores et al
as 1:2014cv01069
Plaintiff:
Richard Huffman
Defendant:
Counselor Flores and Dr. Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
