Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Haws v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00859
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Atomic Energy Commission, Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Haws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
101 Frost Street Associates, L.P. et al v. United States Atomic Energy Commission et al
as 2:2017cv03585
Plaintiff:
101 Frost Street Associates, L.P. and Next Millennium Realty, LLC
Defendant:
Marvex Finishing & Processing Corporation, Gulf & Western Manufacturing Company, Verizon New York, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Sulzer Metco (US) Inc., Physio Chem Corp., Bronco Baltimore, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Ned Rosenbloom v. Atomic Energy Commission, et al
as 15-11934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NED L. ROSENBLOOM
Defendant - Appellee:
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Rosenbloom v. Atomic Energy Commission et al
as 1:2014cv21601
Plaintiff:
Ned L. Rosenbloom
Defendant:
Atomic Energy Commission and US Department of Energy Environmental Management
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Demos v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2014cv00396
Defendant:
Atomic Energy Commission/Agency, F.B.I. and U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff:
John R. Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Quirk et al
as 1:2010cv02533
Plaintiff:
Carlos Martinez
Defendant:
Dennis Quirk, New York State Court Officers Association, Kevin Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Broudy, Alice P., et al v. Mather, Susan H., et al
as 05-5085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alice P. Broudy, Charles L. Clark, Lois E. Hilkert and others
Plaintiff:
Harold R. Kolb, Jr., (Deceased)
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan H. Mather, in her Individual and Official Capacities, Neil S. Otchin, in his Individual and Official Capacities, Robert H. Roswell, in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
