Cases 1 - 10 of 3,700
v. Woodall et al
as 8:2024cv01235
Defendant:
Stacy Woodall, US Attorney General United States of America, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2672 Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
Cesar Almendares v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1772
Petitioner:
CESAR OBED ALMENDARES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronaldo Elias Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1755
Petitioner:
RONALDO ELIAS DA SILVA, CRISTINA APARECIDA DE LANA SILVA, E. R.D.S and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Isaac Carranza-Cortez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1724
Petitioner:
ISAAC DE JESUS CARRANZA-CORTEZ, ZULMA ELIZABETH QUINTEROS-DE CARRANZA and E. M. C.-Q.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Collado-Lantigua v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1721
Petitioner:
JOSE DANNY COLLADO-LANTIGUA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kevin Marsh v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1722
Petitioner:
KEVIN ANTHONY MARSH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Manuel Zuna-Paramo, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1680
Petitioner:
MANUEL ALEXANDER ZUNA-PARAMO, DEISY ANGELICA GUAMAN-BONILLA and D. S. Z.-G.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sheng-Wen Cheng v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1645
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zumar DuBose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1615
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE and ABDUSH DUBOSE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Khawar Saleem v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1622
Petitioner:
KHAWAR SALEEM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
