Cases 11 - 20 of 5,140
Krystyna Sawicka v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1795
Petitioner:
KRYSTYNA SAWICKA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff:
SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
TikTok Inc., et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1113
Petitioner:
TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Ltd.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States,
Manasse Abbanga Rimtobaye v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1773
Petitioner:
MANASSE ABBANGA RIMTOBAYE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Juan Leon Mejia v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1948
Petitioner:
Juan Rufino Leon Mejia
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Maria Weidenburner v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1903
Petitioner:
Maria Isabel Weidenburner
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Diego Morales-Ortega v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1910
Petitioner:
Diego Herlindo Morales-Ortega
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
