Cases 21 - 30 of 89
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
as 3:2018cv00041
Petitioner:
DANIEL GEORGE BROWN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00080
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HALL v. AFSCME et al
as 2:2017cv03417
Plaintiff:
GARY EDWARD HALL
Defendant:
AFSCME, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASCHALL v. BRADLEY, et al
as 3:2017cv00123
Petitioner:
CARL PASCHALL, SR.
Respondent:
ERIC BRADLEY, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DANIELS v. BRADLEY
as 3:2017cv00106
Petitioner:
RASHEED DANIELS
Respondent:
E. BRADLEY, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00072
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00702
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00676
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00681
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
