Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Ennis v. California State Prison - Sacramento et al
as 2:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Ennis
Defendant:
Aubert, A. Herrera, Pehhe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason David Yonai v. Robyn Rihanna Fenty et al
as 2:2020cv04127
Plaintiff:
Jason David Yonai, KazeLoon Records and K.D. Lean Inc. and KazeLoon
Defendant:
Westbury Rd. Ent., Mya Marie Harrison, Robyn Rihanna Fenty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ennis v. Herrera et al
as 2:2018cv00816
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Ennis
Defendant:
A. Herrera, Jordan Tyler, Steve Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Bradford et al
as 2:2016cv00544
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Gibbs
Defendant:
J. R. Bradford, S. Casto, Advincula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Bradford, et al.
as 2:2014cv00831
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Gibbs
Defendant:
J. R. Bradford, S. Casto, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aubert v. Madruga et al
as 1:2013cv01659
Plaintiff:
Ess'nn A. Aubert
Defendant:
E. Madruga, B. Hobbs and J. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01775
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Troche et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gian Agosto Troche , Linda Albrecht , Crystal Apodaca and others
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aubert v. Hector
as 1:2010cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ess'nn A. Aubert
Defendant:
Hector Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ess'nn A. Aubert v. A. Hedgpeth
as 5:2008cv01377
Petitioner:
Ess'nn A Aubert
Respondent:
A Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
