Cases 1 - 10 of 314
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 7:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
CHARLES A PASCHAL, JR
Respondent:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paschal v. Augusta State Medical Prison
as 1:2024cv01323
Petitioner:
Charles A. Paschal, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Radabaugh v. Augusta Business Daily, LLC
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shirley Radabaugh
Defendant:
Augusta Business Daily, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Augusta Division
as 1:2024tc05000
Defendant:
Augusta Division
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jackson v. BET Entertainment et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Defendant:
Stokes & Stokes Law Firm, BET Entertainment, Stokes & Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
