Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Scott v. Aiken Ophthalmology et al
as 3:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lee Scott
Defendant:
Aiken Ophthalmology, Carolina Surgical Center, Aiken Regional Medical Centers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billbro v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00523
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Plaintiff:
Augusta Billbro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. Tantum Companies, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00752
Defendant:
Tantum Companies, LLC, Parrish Restaurants, Ltd. and Back Yard Burgers Development, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jan Augusta Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Gaston et al
as 4:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Camara Johnson
Defendant:
Milton Gaston, Sr., Percy Miles, William Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Gaston et al
as 4:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Antonio Wilson
Defendant:
Milton Gaston, Sr., Bryan Payne, William Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUBA Casualty Insurance Company v. Doctor's Hospital of Augusta LLC
as 2:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
LUBA Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Doctor's Hospital of Augusta LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKenzie v. King et al
as 4:2011cv00102
Petitioner:
Augusta McKenzie
Respondent:
Ron King and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKenzie v. Horton et al
as 3:2010cv00692
Plaintiff:
Augusta McKenzie
Defendant:
Rayford Horton, Robert Brown, Juanita Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dobbs v. Byrd
as 4:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dobbs
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd, Raymond Byrd, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKenzie v. King et al
as 2:2007cv00095
Plaintiff:
Augusta McKenzie
Defendant:
Ronald King, Johnny Denmark and Christopher B Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
