Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. California Department of Rehabilitation
as 3:2013cv05730
Plaintiff:
Augustus M. Brown, II
Defendant:
California Department of Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. California Department of Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2010cv01775
Plaintiff:
Augustus M. Brown, II
Defendant:
California Department of Rehabilitation, Allen Freeman, Alexandra Calhoon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. California Department of Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2010cv01775
Plaintiff:
Augustus M. Brown, II
Defendant:
California Department of Rehabilitation, Shanda Schmitz, Contra Costa Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. Plaquemines Parish Court et al
as 2:2010cv00815
Plaintiff:
Augustus M. Brown, II and San Marlow Brown
Defendant:
Plaquemines Parish Court, Morris Roberts, Louisiana State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Brown v. New Millennium Bank
as 3:2009cv02751
Plaintiff:
Augustus M. Brown, II
Defendant:
New Millennium Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Brown v. New Millennium Bank
as 4:2009cv02751
Plaintiff:
Augustus M. Brown, II
Defendant:
New Millennium Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Brown et al v. Hollywood Video Entertainment Corp. et al
as 3:2009cv02750
Plaintiff:
Augustus M. Brown, II and Sherrie Finch
Defendant:
Hollywood Video Entertainment Corp., Carly Hampton and Beth Gregg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
