Cases
Amy Sherlock, et al v. Gina Austin, et al
as 23-55018
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMY SHERLOCK, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, T.S. and S.S
Plaintiff: ANDREW FLORES, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual, AUSTIN LEGAL GROUP APC, a California Corporation, JOEL R. WOHLFEIL, an individual and others
Darryl Cotton v. Gina Austin, et al
as 22-56077
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARRYL COTTON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual, JESSICA CLAIRE MCELFRESH, an individual and DAVID S. DEMIAN, an individual
Defendant: LARRY GERACI, an individual, REBECCA BERRY, an individual, AUSTIN LEGAL GROUP, a professional corporation and others
Andrew Flores, et al v. USDC-CASD
as 20-71813
Not Classified By Court: LAWRENCE GERACI, an individual, AKA Larry, REBECCA BERRY, an individual, JAMES BARTELL, an individual, AKA Jim and others
Petitioner: ANDREW FLORES, an individual, JANE DOE, an individual and AMY SHERLOCK, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, T.S. and S.S
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Flores et al v. Austin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00656
Defendant: James Bartell, Lawrence Geraci, Tax & Financial Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, Andrew Flores and Amy Sherlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Cotton et al v. Geraci et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02751
Defendant: Larry Geraci, Sean Miller, Adam Witt and others
Plaintiff: Joe Hurtado and Darryl Cotton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cotton v. Geraci et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00325
Plaintiff: Darryl Cotton
Defendant: Larry Geraci, Rebecca Berry, Gina Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?