Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Webb et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv00145
Defendant:
3M Company, Bayer Consumer Care Holdings LLC, Bayer Samson II LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Allan Watson, Robin A. Webb, Cynthia M. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Progressive Gulf Insurance Company v. A.C. et al
as 3:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Progressive Gulf Insurance Company
Defendant:
A.C., Gregory O. Matthews, AutoZone Mississippi, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Ben Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Dickens v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
William Dickens and Karla Dickens
Defendant:
Gardner Denver, Inc., Viking Pump, Inc., Carquest Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Mayhall v. Autozone Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Tammye Neal Mayhall
Defendant:
Autozone Stores, Inc. and Shameka Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randolph et al v. Autozone Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Peachie J. Parvin Randolph and Floyd Randolph
Defendant:
Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jamerson v. Autozone Stores, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dalphne Jamerson
Defendant:
Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coggins v. Autozone Mississippi, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00201
Plaintiff:
Stuart Keith Coggins
Defendant:
Autozone Mississippi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kimbrough v. Autozone Stores, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
Roger Kimbrough, III
Defendant:
Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
