Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Martinez v. AutoZone West LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01011
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Trigo Martinez
Defendant:
AutoZone West LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
H & H Pars Inc v. AutoZone Inc
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
H & H Pars, Inc. doing business as First Choice Auto and H & H Pars Inc doing business as First Choice Auto
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc. d/b/a AutoZone, AutoZone Inc doing business as AutoZone and AutoZone Parts Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sawyer v. AutoZone
as 4:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Trudy Sawyer
Defendant:
AutoZone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alvarado v. AutoZone Inc
as 4:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Cristina Alvarado
Defendant:
Autozone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alvarado v. AutoZone Inc
as 3:2023cv02644
Plaintiff:
Cristina Alvarado
Defendant:
AutoZone Parts Inc and AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
S3G Technology LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Montalvo et al v. Autozone Parts, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Norma Montalvo and Maria Garcia
Defendant:
Autozone Parts, Inc. and Edgar Lucio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ortiz v. AutoZoners LLC
as 7:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Manuel Angel Ortiz
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
