Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DUNCAN v. CITY OF PATERSON, et al.
as 2:2020cv08471
Plaintiff:
Gen. Administrator Shaquana D. Duncan and SHAQUANA D. DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, Officer KYLE WANAMAKER, DR. JOSEPH AFFORTUNATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DURAN-AVILA et al v. HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv06480
Plaintiff:
DAVID DURAN-AVILA , JULIA OBANDO and PAUL ALVARADO
Defendant:
HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, JONATHAN ADORNEY, CESAR CHAVEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAZQUEZ v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
LINETTE VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES F. WITTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AVILA v. MIKHAIL et al
as 2:2012cv04590
Plaintiff:
ANGELO AVILA
Defendant:
ANDREW MIKHAIL, THOMAS YFANTIS, SANTOS BENITEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT v. AICHELE et al
as 5:2012cv03808
Plaintiff:
BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT and PENNSYLVANIA COMMUNITIES ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE, INC.
Defendant:
CAROL AICHELE , GARY D. ALEXANDER and ELI N. AVILA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Hanna et al v. Avila
as 1:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Hanna and Hanna Inc.
Defendant:
Eli N. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
