Cases 1 - 10 of 12
AYALA v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00591
Petitioner:
JAVIER AYALA
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
AYALA v. LAMMER
as 2:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
RAFAEL AYALA
Respondent:
B. LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
AYALA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00357
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, DOUGLAS KRUSE, KLINT STANDER and others
Plaintiff:
SALOMON AYALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AYALA v. KRUSE et al
as 2:2019cv00348
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, DOUGLAS KRUSE, KLINT STANDER and others
Plaintiff:
SALOMON AYALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AYALA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04514
Plaintiff:
MARIA M. AYALA
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GONZAGA v. ROMAN ROMAN AYALA AYALA, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01360
Defendant:
ENRIQUE AYALA, MIGUEL AYALA, MARCARIO ROMAN and others
Plaintiff:
MARIO GONZAGA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ayala v. Hossler et al
as 1:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Angel M Ayala
Defendant:
Jim Hossler and Roger Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOCOCK et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 4:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
GRISELDA AGUIRRE, ROBERTA AYALA, JULIE BOCOCK and others
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
