Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Powers #069618 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Edmund V Powers
Defendant:
David Shinn, S Ojeda, R Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers #069618 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Edmund V Powers
Defendant:
David Shinn, S Ojeda, B Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Alvarez et al
as 4:2019cv00257
Defendant:
B Anderson Flatt, Unknown Salazar, Ayodeji Ladele and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Antwon Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00217
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Rodney B Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company et al
as 2:2017cv03391
Plaintiff:
Michael V Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company, Corizon LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, Lucy Burciaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Lucy Burciaga, Tracy Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Tony L Horton
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
