Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
United States of America et al v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 1.10 Acre of Land, More or Less, In Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv01540
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 1.10 Acre of Land, More or Less, In Montgomery County, Tennessee, Knox B. Thomas, III and Shirley W. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Thomas v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2017cv01117
Petitioner:
Raymond B. Thomas
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2014cv00284
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Thomas
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bunch v. City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee et al (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Adam T Bunch
Defendant:
City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, James T Akagi, Matthew R Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. ACOPIA, LLC
as 3:2014cv00974
Plaintiff:
Jane B. Thomas
Defendant:
ACOPIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mackey v. Mark Luttrell Correctional Center et al
as 2:2011cv02505
Plaintiff:
Melissa Mackey
Defendant:
Mark Luttrell Correctional Center, Sharon Taylor, Lolie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
