Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01233
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06633
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MCKINSEY v. LAB ELITE LLC et al
as 1:2026cv13432
Respondent:
The United State's of America
Defendant:
ROXANNE SCAVONE, Todd Bryant, Zishan Alvi and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MCKINSEY
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Jones v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv03728
Plaintiff:
Alvis Jones
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Ryder Integrated Logistics of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06535
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor, et al. v. Google LLC
as 26-6329
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH TAYLOR, EDWARD MLAKAR, MICK CLEARY and others
Appellant:
MIKE SUSSMAN, MICHAEL ALBERT FOCIA and CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Taylor, et al. v. Google LLC
as 26-6253
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH TAYLOR, EDWARD MLAKAR, MICK CLEARY and others
Appellant:
NATHAN BYARS
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Taylor, et al. v. Google LLC
as 26-5041
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH TAYLOR, EDWARD MLAKAR, MICK CLEARY and others
Appellant:
JIMMIE A. MCCORVEY
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Shomide v. Sanford et al
as 1:2026cv00956
Plaintiff:
Tokunbo Shomide
Defendant:
William Sanford, April Lawson, Alvis Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03459
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
