Cases 1 - 10 of 22
HILL v. BYRD, M.D. et al
as 1:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, M.D. and LAUREN CUPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
HILL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, THOMAS WELLINGTON, T. TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2021pq01784
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
John B Hill
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Asher Hill v. Dennis Meyer, et al
as 21-2884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS MEYER, Doctor, RUTHIE JIMERSON, KIM HOBSON and others
Asher Hill v. Christopher Nicholson, et al
as 20-2460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, Warden, K. MITCHELL, Maintenance Supervisor, DUSTY RUSSELL, Custody Supervisor and others
Asher Hill v. Christopher Nicholson, et al
as 20-1569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, Warden, K. MITCHELL, Maintenance Supervisor, DUSTY RUSSELL, Custody Supervisor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02041
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
HILL v. RINEHART et al
as 2:2018cv00462
Defendant:
GARY MCMILLIN and D. RINEHART
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
