Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Johnson v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Dusty Rhodes, Williamson County Jail, Sgt. (f/n/u) Driskill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Cohen et al
as 2:2018cv02219
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Harris
Defendant:
Shalonda Lasha Cohen, Barbara B. Johnson and Tennessee Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Synovus Bank et al
as 2:2014cv02950
Defendant:
Synovus Bank , Crimson Portfolio, LLC, Crimson Portfolio Alpha, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
B. Johnson and M. Johnson
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Irwin et al
as 2:2014cv02931
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Mitchell
Defendant:
Timothy Irwin, Sr., Timothy Irwin, Jr., Michael Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00249
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. and Union Carbide Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bessie B Johnson and Johnny R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
Wayne Clements, Hoyt Clements, Jr. and Kenneth Clements
Defendant:
Randall V. Johnson and Kenneth B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Green v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Norma J Green
Defendant:
Randall V Johnson and Kenneth B Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Johnson et al v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
James B. Johnson, James B. Johnson, Sylvia S. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Charlie B. Mitchell, Jr., Charlie B. Mitchell, Jr., CBM Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
