Cases 41 - 50 of 74
ALLEN v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2009cv00175
Petitioner:
STEVE ALLEN
Respondent:
HELEN J MARBERRY, B. R. JETT and HARLEY G LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Enaam Arnaout v. Helen J. Marberry
as 09-2029
Petitioner - Appellant:
ENAAM M. ARNAOUT
Respondent - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY and B. R. JETT
ARNAOUT v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2009cv00055
Petitioner:
ENAAM ARNAOUT
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY and B. R. JETT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHAPMAN v. JETT et al
as 2:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
SEIFULLAH CHAPMAN
Defendant:
B. R. JETT, PAUL MCNULTY, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMS DIVISION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BENKAHLA v. JETT et al
as 2:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
SABRI BENKAHLA
Defendant:
B. R. JETT, PAUL MCNULTY, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMS DIVISION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stewart v. Warden Stines et al
as 6:2009cv00010
Petitioner:
Stanley Stewart
Respondent:
B. R. Jett
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ROYER et al v. JETT et al
as 2:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
RANDALL TODD ROYER, SEIFULLAH CHAPMAN and SABRI BENKAHLA
Defendant:
B. R. JETT, PAUL MCNULTY, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMS DIVISION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00005
Petitioner:
ANDREW A. CHAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and B. R. JETT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HENRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SUMMERS v. JETT
as 2:2008cv00445
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS
Respondent:
B. R. JETT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
