Cases 1 - 10 of 124
B.E. SCAIFE PLUMBING COMPANY, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
B.E. SCAIFE PLUMBING COMPANY, INC. doing business as TAMCO SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Thomas
as 24-726
Defendant:
NEGUS THOMAS, JERKENO WALLACE, LAVAR JACKSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 24-196
Defendant:
NEGUS THOMAS, LAVAR JACKSON, KAVOHN TAYLOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JERKENO WALLACE and Uptown
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
B.E. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv01675
Plaintiff:
B.E.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Nesselrotte et al
as 0:2023cv00085
Counter Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
John Paul Nesselrotte, II, Michael G. Evans, B.E. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jocelyn Elliker, et al v. USA
as 22-17027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOCELYN ELLIKER, CARRIE ROMO, as the parent and guardian ad litem for B.E., MEGAN ROMO ELLIKER, individually and as the Executor of the Estate of James Elliker and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
CHRISTOPHER A. HART
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-1130
Appellant:
B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.
Appellee:
TWITTER, INC. and GOOGLE LLC
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-1128
Appellant:
B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.
Appellee:
TWITTER, INC. and GOOGLE LLC
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-1127
Appellant:
B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.
Appellee:
TWITTER, INC. and GOOGLE LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
