Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MARTE v. B.O.P. et al
as 2:2024cv01516
Petitioner: JOSE MIGUEL MARTE
Respondent: B.O.P., I.C.E. and SUPERIOR COURT, NJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JONASSEN et al v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff: MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant: B.O.P., U.S. and MR. PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. MARLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05477
Defendant: R. SMITH, SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE SECTION/SERVICES (S.I.S.) DEPT. AND STAFF, WARDEN SEAN MARLER and others
Plaintiff: ROCMON L. SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. U.S.A. et al
as 3:2018cv00200
Plaintiff: Richie A. Hill
Defendant: U.S.A., U.S.Government, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Souels v. B.O.P. et al
as 3:2018cv00177
Petitioner: SEAN A. SOUELS
Respondent: B.O.P. and Perdue
Arbitrator: nefpsJBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WARREN v. UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00590
Petitioner: Isaac D. Warren
Respondent: United States , B.O.P. and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WARREN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv06436
Petitioner: ISAAC D. WARREN
Respondent: UNITED STATES and B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CAMACHO v. LIMESTONE DETENTION CENTER et al
as 2:2014cv01960
Plaintiff: SIRILO ALVAREZ CAMACHO
Defendant: LIMESTONE DETENTION CENTER, ALL MEDICAL PERSONEL and B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2014cv00500
Petitioner: Tyrone Wells
Respondent: B.O.P. and J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARSONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01556
Plaintiff: RANDALL PARSONS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B.O.P., FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER PHILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?