Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Luciano-Baker v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Sonia Ivette Luciano-Baker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Tamara Dawn Baker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Jack Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Ayeshah Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Baker-Miller v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Carrie Irene Baker-Miller
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Franklin Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Erica L. Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BAKER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
MARVIN BAKER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Heather Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
