Cases 21 - 30 of 42
POET, LLC et al v. Nelson Engineering, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv04029
Plaintiff:
POET, LLC and POET Research, Inc.
Defendant:
Nelson Engineering, Inc. and Jerry Baker
Counter_claimant:
Jerry Baker and Nelson Engineering, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
POET Research, Inc. and POET, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Baker v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv05042
Plaintiff:
Sherri A. Baker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edmond v. Thoreson et al
as 4:2015cv04055
Plaintiff:
Kevin DuShon Edmond
Defendant:
J. Thoreson, Baker, Christiansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cody v. McDonald et al
as 4:2014cv04155
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Ashley McDonald, Tim Meirose, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Willis
as 4:2014cv04110
Petitioner:
Dustin Baker
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mortensbak v. Butler et al
as 3:2013cv03026
Plaintiff:
David Roger Mortensbak
Defendant:
Nicholas Butler, Paul Wayne Smersrud, McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rindahl, Randy v. Pristen, J. et al
as 4:2013cv04078
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
J. Pristen, J. Smith, Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong et al v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04145
Plaintiff:
Gregory Armstrong, Tracy Armstrong and R. A.
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Dennis Kaemingk, Daryl Slykhuis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haugen v. Tea Area School District et al
as 4:2012cv04032
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Haugen
Defendant:
Tea Area School District, Jerry Schutz, Wendy Moorhead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rindahl, Randy v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 4:2011cv04131
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Daugaard, Tim Reisch, D. Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
