Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Baker v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
John Baker
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lumpkin v. SCORE Jail et al
as 2:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lumpkin, Jr
Defendant:
SCORE Jail, M Gomez, T Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Ward et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Marvin Ward, Jr, Samantha Love and Rhonda Lynn Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05072
Plaintiff:
David Michael Aaron Baker
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, James Key, Ron Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Hale et al
as 2:2022cv01672
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker and Jamall Baker
Defendant:
laura lee hale, Valerie Weber and john hoag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Bass et al
as 2:2022cv01478
Plaintiff:
Nathen Dwayne Baker
Defendant:
Gary Bass, Anthony Boyd Jr., Julia Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Seeley et al
as 3:2022cv05584
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Camden Crouse, Trent Eisenbeisz, Chris Hallgren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Seely
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Jeremy Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. King County
as 2:2021cv00491
Respondent:
King County
Petitioner:
Nathen Dwayne Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers et al v. Department of Children Youth and Families et al
as 3:2021cv05248
Defendant:
Marybeth Queral, Department of Children, Youth and Families, Jody Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Joe Rogers, III, Ronald Ackerson, Damien Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
