Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hucks v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Savannah Hucks
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Crystal Ballard, Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ballard v. McFalls et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
Brenda Triplett, Kelly Young, Mindy Denny and others
Plaintiff:
Marcia Ballard
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Stroud v. Gaston County et al
as 3:2013cv00684
Plaintiff:
James T. Stroud
Defendant:
Gaston County, Alan Cloninger, R. Cauthran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers et al v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00714
Plaintiff:
Loushonda Myers, C.M., A.M. and others
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Krista L. Bennet, Fern Gunn Simeon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Klyman v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 5:2012cv00627
Plaintiff:
Karen Klyman
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Carlton Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
