Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Coskun v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv10880
Plaintiff:
Levend Coskun
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Oguejiofor et al v. Bank of America Corporation
as 5:2024cv10741
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma Oguejiofor and Chunco Investments
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rutues-Burns v. Bank of America Corporation
as 2:2019cv11767
Plaintiff:
Chawanne Rutues-Burns
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Bakalis v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv10356
Defendant:
Ubong Akpan, Bank of America Corporation, BofA Merrill Lynch Asset Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Bakalis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mixon v. Trott et al
as 1:2018cv00499
Plaintiff:
Keturah Mixon
Defendant:
David Trott , Trott Law, P.C. , Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv13843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Roperti v. FIA Card Services, N.A. is a subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv13262
Plaintiff:
Alfred Roperti
Defendant:
FIA Card Services, N.A. is a subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. (USA) and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
