Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 135
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant: LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee: INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
In Re: The Berkshire Bank
as 23-603
Petitioner: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, The Berkshire Bank, Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and others
Respondent: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. and others
Eddystone Rail Company, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 23-561
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eddystone Rail Company, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., Fifth Third Bank and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Pierre Lavi v. MUFG Bank Ltd. et al
as 2:2021cv03178
Defendant: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., MUFG Bank Ltd., PT Bank Danamon Indonesia, Tbk and others
Plaintiff: Pierre Lavi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3626
Defendant: Rabobank Group, Citigroup Global Markets Japan, Inc., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Defendant / Appellee: Deutsche Bank AG, RBS Securities Japan Limited, R.P. Martin Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
McCarthy et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05832
Plaintiff: Brenda Davis, Pamela Faust, Sondra Russell and others
Defendant: Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank U.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?