Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Young Jo, et al v. Six Unknown naes agents or Mr.
as 16-14061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO and JAIMES ENRIQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAES AGENTS OR MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BARACK OBAMA
Dhaved Kapel v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-11593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DHAVED KAPEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Ronald Jones v. Barack Obama
as 16-10165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents, et al
as 16-10089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, Mr. President of the United States
Gary v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cathleen R. Gary
Defendant:
United States Government, Barack Obama, National Security Agency/Central Security Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Germaine Harris v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-14584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERMAINE D. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President and MICHELLE OBAMA, First Lady
Brooks v. Kachmar et al (JOINT ASSIGNED)(MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Brooks
Defendant:
Kala Kachmar, The Montgomery Advertiser, Sheila Meuse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings et al v. Obama et al
as 1:2015cv22794
Plaintiff:
Paul Cummings and Theresa Cummings
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Loretta E. Lynch, Office of Governor Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander Patterson, IV v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-13207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER PATTERSON, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN, Vice President, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents, et al
as 15-12984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, Mr. President of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
