Cases 41 - 50 of 412
Jerry Dedrick v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-10968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA LYNCH, Unites States Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Bureau of Prisons and BARACK OBAMA, United States President and the Commander in Chief
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 15-50852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Keelin v. Obama et al
as 2:2015cv00222
Plaintiff:
David DeWayne Keelin
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Jacob Lew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dedrick v. Lynch et al
as 1:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lewis Dedrick
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E Samuels, Jr. and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 15-50050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
John Briley v. Police Dept City of W Monroe, et al
as 14-31209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN BRILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF WEST MONROE, OFFICER GARRETT, OFFICER HORTON and others
Williamwest v. Barack Obama, et al
as 2:2014cv02330
Plaintiff:
Dodiyi J. Williamwest
Defendant:
Barack Obama, HUD, HANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 14-31084
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, U.S. 3RD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, JIM BRENNAN and others
Young Jo, et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 14-50973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO, BERTRAM COLIN JOHNSON, CRESCENIO BARRAZA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
