Cases 1 - 10 of 516
Perkins v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Office of the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ajaero v. Obama
as 23-8117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. AJAERO
Defendant / Appellee:
Former President BARACK OBAMA, HILLARY R. CLINTON, President JOE BIDEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT - 47TH PRECINCT
Shabazz v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv10546
Petitioner:
Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz
Respondent:
The United States of America and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ajaero v. Obama et al
as 1:2023cv08096
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Ajaero
Defendant:
Former President Barack Obama, Hillary R. Clinton, President Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Furst v. Obama
as 23-1088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Ira Furst
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, Governor and State of Connecticut
Defendant:
Barack Obama, President
Toussaint v. Obama
as 1:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
Fritz Gerald Toussaint
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Epperson v. United States
as 22-1384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chris Jonathon Epperson
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, Geoffrey S. Binney, Bill Clinton and others
Moussa v. Obama et al
as 1:2022cv04625
Plaintiff:
Momen Mahmoud Moussa
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moussa v. Obama et al
as 1:2022cv04061
Plaintiff:
Momen Mahmoud Moussa
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Furst v. Obama
as 22-610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Ira Furst
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, Governor and State of Connecticut
Defendant:
Barack Obama, President
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
