Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Kennedy v. Schofield et al
as 1:2016cv01049
Plaintiff:
Wayne T. Kennedy
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, James Holloway, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Social Security, Commissioner of (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
Donald D Barrett
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Howell v. Farris et al
as 1:2015cv01027
Plaintiff:
V. Calvin Howell
Defendant:
Jimmy Farris, Sheila Dellinger, City of Bolivar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George et al v. Haslam et al
as 3:2014cv02182
Plaintiff:
Tracey E. George , Ellen Wright Clayton , Deborah Webster-Clair and others
Defendant:
William Edward Haslam, Tre Hargett, Mark Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Schofield et al
as 3:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton, Charles Montague, Derrick Payne and others
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Barrett et al v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Regina Barrett and Ronald Barrett
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee, Jesse Rudd and Kristen Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. McClain et al
as 2:2014cv02203
Plaintiff:
Kieron Farsha Lee
Defendant:
Danny McClain, Rico Williams, Andre Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson -v- City Of Memphis
as 2:2014cv02202
Plaintiff:
Dale Robinson and Andrea Roginson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tod Barrett (IBM #11915) and Christopher Miller (IBM #11574)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
