Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Richard Boozer, Sr. v. Barry Smith, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
CO WILLIAM FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY R. SMITH and CORRECT CARE SOLUTION CO INC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER, SR.
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, COUNSELOR GINTER and others
Petitioner:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Baxter v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Petitioner:
Justin Baxter
Respondent:
Barry R. Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STAGNER v. SMITH
as 2:2020cv00372
Plaintiff:
STAGNER
Defendant:
SMITH
Petitioner:
JOHN T. STAGNER
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANSOME v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv01224
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, BARRY R. SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JERRY RANSOME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REINERT v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00204
Defendant:
LEO DUNN, BARRY SMITH, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY P REINERT
Respondent:
BARRY R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOOZER v. PEACE et al
as 3:2019cv00201
Defendant:
BARRY R. SMITH, LISA R. PEACE and MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. BOOZER, SR. and RICHARD LONEY BOOZER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00334
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE (PBPP) and Mr. BARRY SMITH
Respondent:
MR. BARRY R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GHOLSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, PEACE, PAMELA S. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOLDER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
GLYNN A. HOLDER
Defendant:
BARRY R. SMITH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, JANET PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
