Cases 31 - 40 of 272
SKOPINSKI v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv05271
Petitioner:
JOHN SKOPINSKI
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COULSTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05218
Petitioner:
TROY COULSTON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, BARRY SMITH and LAWRENCE KRASNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nieves v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv01932
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
Barry Smith, Ms. Civiello, Kari Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAPHART v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01546
Plaintiff:
HAROLD E. LEAPHART
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BARRY SMITH, BOBBI JO SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HENSLEY v. MCCAULLEY et al
as 3:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HENSLEY
Defendant:
JONATHAN MCCAULLEY, KYLE BOOZER, BRENDA LEE DUBLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bashir v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01720
Petitioner:
Jihad Bashir
Respondent:
Barry Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AYALA v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv04372
Petitioner:
JONATHAN AYALA
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv04216
Petitioner:
KEVIN THOMAS
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kearney v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv01636
Petitioner:
Richard Muliek Kearney
Respondent:
Barry Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GLEASON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GLEASON, SR.
Defendant:
MR. BARRY SMITH, B. GETGEN and OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
