Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MORGAN et al v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
CRAIG MORGAN and JALESSEY POOLE
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, BAY COUNTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ALVIN ILER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PASULO v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv24661
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PASULO
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, RHINEHART, FATULA SLAUGHTER and others
BENNETT v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C BENNETT
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BAY COUNTY SHERIFF TOMMY FORD, JACK HOWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Loomis v. Bay County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv11511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Loomis
Defendant:
Bay County Sheriff's Department and Department of Corrections, State of Michigan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HAYES v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 5:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Dwight M Hayes and DWIGHT HAYES
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PANAMA CITY, Jacob Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton v. Springfield Police Department Officers et al
as 5:2019cv00260
Defendant:
Panama City Police Department, Springfield Police Department Officers, Parker Police Deaprtment and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamont Britton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ratfisch v. Bay County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv13722
Plaintiff:
Bernd Ratfisch
Defendant:
Bay County Jail and Bay County Sheriff Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
