Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Epps v. U.S. Bank National Association, et. al. (PLR2)
as 3:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Gary Epps
Defendant:
BSCMS 1999-CLF1 Clinton Highway REO, LLC, U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee, Successor to Bank of America, N.A. (Successor by merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A.), as Trustee, for the Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S. Bank National Association v. Lakeview Retail Property Owner
as 16-60373
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (TRUSTEE), successor in interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, for the registered holders of Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Secu
Defendant - Appellant:
LAKEVIEW RETAIL PROPERTY OWNER, L.L.C.
Stephen Lustig v. Bear Stearns Residential
as 10-10654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN LUSTIG
Defendant - Appellee:
BEAR STEARNS RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Mendez et al v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv05961
Plaintiff:
Augustin Mendez and Teresa Mendez
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Bear Stearns Residential, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Chang v. EMC Mortgage Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv01644
Plaintiff:
Tou Chang
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corp., Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation, Western Region and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Chang v. EMC Mortgage Corp. et al
as 2:2009at00938
Plaintiff:
Tou Chang
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corp., Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation, Western Region and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Lustig v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2008cv14419
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lustig
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
