Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Behrens v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2021cv00144
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, SSA
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Behrens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Behrens v. Sanofi US Services Inc et al
as 2:2019cv10673
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Behrens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. King et al
as 6:2016cv00297
Defendant:
Major FNU Behren, Assistant Warden FNU King and Cpt. FNU Moore
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Ramirez v. Gross et al
as 4:2013cv03224
Plaintiff:
Leocadio Ramirez, Jr.
Defendant:
Stuart Gross, Mark Newman, Brad Behrens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Gross et al
as 5:2013cv00942
Defendant:
Amos Barton, Brad Behrens, Andrew Blizzard and others
Plaintiff:
Leocadio Ramirez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Gross et al
as 5:2012cv01131
Defendant:
Amos Barton, Brad Behrens, Andrew Blizzard and others
Plaintiff:
Leocadio Ramirez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ShubertCollin & Associes v. von Behren et al
as 3:2011cv01937
Plaintiff:
ShubertCollin & Associes
Defendant:
Sally S von Behren and William S von Behren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Littles v. Goforth et al
as 3:2011cv00031
Defendant:
Leo Altenberg, Kristina Behrens, Carl Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin B. Littles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
