Cases 1 - 10 of 46
BEST v. GOODWIN et al
as 3:2014cv00690
Plaintiff:
WILBERT BEST
Defendant:
BERNARD GOODWIN, GSYCF MEDICAL STAFF and NJ DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLIDAY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2013cv01099
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL HOLLIDAY
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, BERNARD GOODWIN, MICHELE RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIDDELL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv02669
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LIDDELL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE HAYMAN, BERNARD GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIDSON v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2009cv06424
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, RALPH WOODWARD, BERNARD GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIDSON v. LOURY et al
as 2:2009cv05810
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
DERECK LOURY, GEORGE HAYMAN, RALPH WOODWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTS v. GOODWIN
as 2:2009cv04985
Petitioner:
RODNEY ROBERTS
Respondent:
BERNARD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREENFIELD v. CORZINE et al
as 2:2009cv04983
Plaintiff:
GILBERT THOMAS GREENFIELD, JR.
Defendant:
JON CORZINE, ANN MILGRAM, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. GOODWIN
as 2:2009cv03156
Petitioner:
RODNEY ROBERTS
Respondent:
BERNARD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ASHBRIDGE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2009cv03147
Petitioner:
KENNETH ASHBRIDGE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANN MILGRAM and BERNARD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBBS v. GOODWIN et al
as 1:2009cv01046
Petitioner:
RICHARD GIBBS
Respondent:
BERNARD GOODWIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
