Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Thompson et al v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00903
Plaintiff:
Donna Thompson and Phillip Thompson
Defendant:
Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P. and BRE DDR Cool Springs Pointe LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Lopez v. Best Loading Service, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02053
Plaintiff:
Manuel Lopez
Defendant:
Best Loading Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ansley et al v. Erhart et al
as 3:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bell , Caroline Best , Betty Coleman and others
Defendant:
Steven C Erhart , Larry Kelley , Charles G. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maverick Tube Corporation v. A&H Transportation et al
as 2:2011cv02774
Plaintiff:
Maverick Tube Corporation
Defendant:
A&H Transportation, Advance Business Capital LLC, Angel Trucking and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011mc00034
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Ohldam et al
as 2:2011cv02355
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
Bill Ohldam, Robert Moore, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thomas
Defendant:
Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc. and Elite Roofing Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Potrawski v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.
as 3:2010cv00359
Plaintiff:
Ginger Potrawski
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Petty et al v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
William R Petty, Rosa Petty and Mary Essex
Defendant:
Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Stores L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
